CHRyrmmFk/hqdefault.jpg' alt='Watch A Good Day To Die, Hoka Hey Download' title='Watch A Good Day To Die, Hoka Hey Download' />Issuu is a digital publishing platform that makes it simple to publish magazines, catalogs, newspapers, books, and more online. Easily share your publications and get. INTER. NET NO CONTRACT RESIDENTIAL PHONE AND INTERNET SERVICE offering no contract Phone and Internet service so you can try something different and better with. Obstacle course racer, ultra and mountain runner. Always up for a new challenge. There are many interpretations to the internet for this web marketing or similar terms such as online marketing, internet marketing, emarketing and others. Thunder soars past hawks. How to Eat PlantBased and Get All the Protein You Need Want to eat a wholefood plantbased diet, but worried about protein Our 7Day Kickstart Plan is unique in. Future planetary alignment the four worlds. Get reliable, lowcost dialup Internet service, highspeed broadband Internet access, Web hosting more. Connect with us for savings, support satisfactionTraining for a 1. Hour Race. In my opinion, this is a a great example of a doctor seeing what he wants to see. In the first chart, BOTH extreme and moderate levels of exercise seem to plateau the actual study shows it doesnt but more on that later However, you can get to that level faster with extreme exercise, and the final result is a 1. There is absolutely no negative. All the data shows is that the benefits plateau sooner again, not actually see next paragraph. So after 4. I get no further benefit, but then the chart doesnt show that I get worse benefits either. In fact, when Dr Wen who did the study was asked about if they saw this improvement erode after longer the 5. By 1. 20 min per day, the hazard ratio for all cause mortality was around 0. The adverse effects of strenuous exercise for incremental efforts for more than an hour a day did not seem to outweigh the benefits. Watch A Good Day To Die, Hoka Hey Download' title='Watch A Good Day To Die, Hoka Hey Download' />We were not able to identify an upper limit of physical activity, either moderate or vigorous, above which more harm than good will occur in terms of long term life expectancy benefits meaning there is now plateau, it keeps going up slowlysource http www. So, this first chart is clearly manipulated to withhold data. If you continued that blue line for vigorous exercise to line up with where the moderate line ends, the blue line would have been shown NOT to plateau but to continue up actually off of the chart But WORSE THEN THAT. A method called Cox regression was used to quantify the association between running and mortality after adjusting for baseline age, sex, examination year, body mass index, current smoking, heavy alcohol drinking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, parental CVD, and levels of other physical activities. OKeefe didnt explain that, but its in the actual data linked belowOK, take a deep breath and think about that for a second. It is complicated, but basically, what this means is that they used statistical methods to effectively equalize everyones weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, and so on. But this is absurd One of the main reason people run is to reducing weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, etc. Theyre effectively saying, If we ignore the known health benefits of greater amounts of aerobic exercise, then greater amounts of aerobic exercise dont have any health benefits. Again, this is researchers looking for an answer and manipulating the data to get it. Well, actually, manipulating how they explain the data. You can see the data yourself here http tinyurl. In the second chart, again, he says after a certain level, you tend to plateau. If you look at the chart closely, here you will see the slightest incline at the end, but youll notice OKeefe barely mentions that. My guess is because if you look into the study, the increase is within the margin of error of the study. So again, more exercise and more extreme exercise has benefits, but there is NO DATA that is given that shows it is detrimental. I think the most telling thing he says, which shows once again just how little doctors know, is his first example of his friend Jon who is 6. OKeefe says, at that level, the arteries are as hard as bone. And yet, his heart is beating, it is moving, every step he takes his whole body is in motion and if his arteries were like bones, even if just the arteries in his heart were like that, chances are he would be dead. However, his friend does have a count of 1. And his friend runs marathons. And his friend is 6. And his friend runs 1. Honestly, if a number of 4. IN TROUBLE and this guy runs 1. Well then maybe doctors need to re evaluate this scale. Clearly if a guy can get to 1. I wonder how many heart surgeries OKeefe has recommended on people who had a score of 4. I really hope his friend Jon said You keep your scale, Ill keep runningOK, next he says we are not meant for sustained level of exercise that is over 1 hour. Clearly an American doctorHello, lets go to some other countries. Ive lived in Russia for 8 years. You walk A LOT. Up hills, down hills, carrying all your food in bags from the market. Your heart rate goes up. You get a tremendous workout, sometimes for hours every day. Watch Mickey`S Twice Upon A Christmas Online IMDB here. Or better yet, lets just look in America. Have you ever worked on a farm I have. Try cleaning a horse stall stall by hand. Or milking 3. 0 cows by hand when the power goes out. Takes hours and hours Try lifting hay bales all day. Sorry, you dont get to stop after an hour. Do you really think that a guy who works out 1 hour a day, moderately, is in better shape then the farmer throwing 5. As someone who grew up doing that, I know the answer I also know a lot of farmers who are still throwing hay bales in their 8. Less so now that farmers rely on machinery. Joker`S Wild Full Movie In English here. Again, less exercise, less health benefitsSo, what about all the data that veteran runners have worn out hearts. Watch Season Of The Witch Online more. OK, well, maybe, just maybe you are not meant to live forever. Comparing an 8. 0 year old runners heart to a 8. But are you saying that you expect these two mens hearts to continue for another 8. Is this doctor really saying you should have a perfectly healthy heart at 8. Assuming they will both die within 5 years 1. I might add, what is the advantage of having a pristine heart the day I die We all die sometime. These studies are of veteran runners. But they seem to still be alive and healthy. He is not talking about cadavers. Also, as he states earlier, we dont have people dying left and right in these endurance sports. On the contrary, as the sport continues as he said, we have only been at this for 2. Im routinely passed by 5. I was actually passed by a 7. Im in my 4. 0s, and actually got 2nd in my age division the day I was passed by the 7. Next, using Cabio Blanco as an example of extreme runners and this doctor is suggesting that anyone who is running a marathon a year is an extreme runner is like saying Michael Jordan is in the same league as your above average team player down at the YMCA. Seriously, Cabio Who was an amazing man would run 8 1. He would often run with little or no water, he pushed himself to extremes that the rest of us just look at in awe. But, he was NOT in the same league as 9. And to use him as any kind of an example of the dangers of running is shameful and disingenuous to say the least. In the chart showing the chance of death by distance. It is very blury, and I wish I could see it clearly, plus I would love to dig into the details, and know the rate of the study, but I think it is interesting that the difference between column 3 the second green column which would be the sweet spot for running apparently OKeefe says 5 1. Also, as you look at this chart, you will notice that the changes within the green columns seem to vary widely. From 0. 7. 8 0. Based on just that, it would seem to indicate that running 5 1. In fact, almost a 1. Of course, if you can get over that hump, and run 1. MORE healthy then you were when you only ran 1 5 miles and 1. So, based on the data, clearly there is a detrimental effect from running 5 1. OK. Of course that doesnt fit the hypothesis, so that part is ignored. So, lets go to the second red line. That number is. 9. As a reminder, the second green line is. So, based on this data, running 2. BAD Sure, you have a 1. BAD. However, running 5 1. GREAT. Why Because at 5 1. But wait, really There is ONLY a 2 difference in those, with lower numbers before and after. I wonder what the rate was at 3. Obviously if it went up, it would be on the chart.